| Author |
Message |
|
|
#311 2007-06-28 23:51 GMT |
...and it looks pretty bad I think:
let me know your thoughts about it.
You can read the full story here
www.myshots.com |
|
|
|
#312 2007-06-29 02:38 GMT |
I really do not like it. It doesn't sell anything to me, and I think that it just looks messy. Also, I don't like the color. If they were going to go with all red, they could have just chosen a more vibrant shade.
|
|
|
|
#334 2007-07-03 02:05 GMT |
I really think its a pretty bad job. Someone should be fired 
www.myshots.com |
|
|
|
#354 2007-07-05 22:29 GMT |
Looks like it should be for the Beijing Olympics instead.
|
|
|
|
#434 2007-07-16 16:11 GMT |
Someone should be more than fired, they should be beaten. What kind of a logo is that, what does it stand for? There is no way that could stand for the Olympics, otherwise I am truly going blind here and don't see it at all!
|
|
|
|
#1158 2007-10-15 12:49 GMT |
A logo is supposed to be a "recognizable graphic design element, representing an organization or product." The Olympics' Governing Body (or somebody) should have another go at this 2012 logo as it is certainly not recognizable and not at all representative of anything I would (personally) associate with the word OLYMPICS. Don't mean to be too insensitive, but it's terrible.
Winston |
|
|
|
#1162 2007-10-15 17:33 GMT |
Can be used for constipations... Just look on it... I think it is done for Hallowine and misplaced.
|
|
|
|
#1164 2007-10-16 09:19 GMT |
It looks to me like the configuration of the continents of the world prior to continental drift!
|
|
|
|
#1165 2007-10-17 05:40 GMT |
Biggest blunder since George Bush. How the hell could that have happened?
|
|
|
|
#1167 2007-10-17 14:21 GMT |
One of the worst logodesign I've ever seen. I know there are things what are best to be forgotten but the first thing what crossed my mind when I looked at this was the London metro bombing not the Olympic Games.  I hope it'll be replaced soon... 
There are 10 types of people. Those who understand binary and those who don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1174 2007-10-18 13:27 GMT |
I can see that the top half should represent 20 and the bottom half represents 12, but when I look at it, all I see is a swastika.
Roy Lewis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1186 2007-10-23 10:21 GMT |
Wow that is pretty bad not alot of brain cells were used to design that one.
|
|
|
|
#1187 2007-10-23 11:54 GMT |
To put my initial thoughts into words upon seeing the logo was: UGLY, UGLY, UGLY ! ! ! Oh yea...and the one other thing was:
"What is this for???"
CdnBuilt |
|
|
|
#1193 2007-10-26 14:25 GMT |
I thought the Olympic supposed to represent different country, continent, people, believe, etc. and bring all of those things together in harmony. What happen with the ol' fashion color like red, green, yellow, black, and blue like the one on the Olympic flag?
|
|
|
|
#1415 2007-12-12 07:47 GMT |
Yep, pretty ugly. Fire the marketing whiz-kids and put it out there for the public to design a logo, then pick a winner. There has to be someone out there that can capture the spirit of the Olympics better than that.
|
|
|
|
#1417 2007-12-12 15:49 GMT |
Think I need to expand my Anglo-Saxon vocabulary to describe it
|
|
|
|
#1421 2007-12-13 12:58 GMT |
Looks like crap. Looks like a designer gave the pen tool to his 6 year old son and decided to turn in his work.
|
|
|
|
#1422 2007-12-14 08:45 GMT |
The logo was such a mess it took me a moment to figure out that it says 2012. It's definitely ugly and doesn't do anything to hold your attention or convey any feeling of London as the host location. Absolutely no imagination involved there!
|
|
|
|
#1423 2007-12-18 04:33 GMT |
and they paid £300.000 for it
|
|
|
|
#1431 2007-12-19 13:51 GMT |
It's a really lousy 2012 written
|
|
|
|
#1453 2007-12-22 22:38 GMT |
Well atleast I know that I can get a job for my five year old son on the IOC promotions team. What a load of #&^). Great job Kojak for giving so many people in one place a laugh.
Happy Snappin' |
|
|
|
#1534 2008-01-24 09:43 GMT |
This does not impress me where are the rings and all the colour.See had to look twice to notice the rings.
|
|
|
|
#1556 2008-02-12 22:21 GMT |
Good gosh, how horrible. I assume I haven't seen it before because they were to embarassed to release it.
I tried looking at it from different angles, stared at it like you would one of those "pictures hidden in a picture" and still can't get anything out of it.
They need to try again. With another designer.
|
|
